Board Thread:Theories and Rumors/@comment-37796351-20181212151153/@comment-30938718-20190112143438

MemoryAngel wrote: Chimadino wrote:

MemoryAngel wrote: Here's a fun fact

When characters from a story, movie or show call a villain or hero "all-powerful" they really mean "near all-powerful", as an all-powerful being doesn't have any weaknesses. Take Nadakhan for example; Jay called him all-powerful, except he had several weaknesses, the biggest one being tiger widow venom.

All-powerful antagonists are actually quite rare in media, for if the story in question had one, there would be absolutely no way for the protagonists to stop them/it. An all-powerful antagonist would probably equal a demented, evil universe without any happy endings, EVER. No. Just take Sauron from LotR. If that all-powerful villain has an object or power in his story stronger or equal with him in power (Like the One Ring in Sauron's case), and if someone else destroys it, then the villain would be also defeated. For exemple, the Overlord is defetenly all-powerful, as he has no known weaknesses. Ah, but both Sauron and the Overlord physical form's can be destroyed, and that's a weakness. Their spirits can't.